Posts tagged as:

VC

Google’s New Venture Capital Fund

by Jason Wilk on March 31, 2009

google-venture-capital

[Post to Twitter] 

{ 0 comments }

Green Tech Taking A Back Seat To The Financial Dilemma

by Jason Wilk on December 11, 2008

green-light-bulb

  • When things were running fairly smooth in the financial markets for the last few years, clean energy technology was on everyone’s radar from world leaders all the way down to the average consumer. That widely spread optimism is now taking a back seat due to the financial crisis, which is not good in the face of a potential global catastrophe, not to mention billions of dollars in venture capital money pouring into clean tech companies. Venture investments in North America, Europe, China and India across 158 companies reached $2.6 billion in the third quarter of 2008, a record quarter for clean tech investments.
  • The recent global summit on climate change in Poznan, Poland outlined the fears of green supporters surrounding the growing apathy for clean tech solutions while we fight through the tough financial crisis. Moreover, their survey shows less support from high level adopters for wind energy, solar power, biofuels, biomass and hydrogen energy as technologies with “high potential” to reduce carbon levels in the atmosphere over the next 25 years. It’s not just the adopters however, climate experts now have less faith of finding a ubiquitous solution for the masses that will reduce the carbon emissions to appropriate levels in time. The survey below shows the breakdown in the drop of what experts feel will make a difference over last year (this year in blue).
Poll
  • The biggest drop in optimism was for first-generation biofuels from crops. Only 12 percent of respondents saw high potential there, down from 21 percent last year. This was an obvious one. Last week I broke down the math equation to why it’s physically impossible to use biofuels to come close to alleviating a major nation like the US off of standard oil. Energy conservation and more efficient technology wins everyone’s vote, but the problem is no one knows what technology that is yet.
  • Electric cars are certainly not the end all solution to the problem. Even if everyone in the US drives an electric car (which won’t happen), that’s still only 33% of U.S carbon dioxide emissions. Not to mention electricity burns coal, which emits around 1.7 times as much carbon per unit of energy when burned as does natural gas. (also, there is no such thing as clean coal)
  • Let’s talk about the political side of things holding up clean tech. The Kyoto Protocol is about to expire, and we are in desperate need of finding a new one that includes China and India as well as puts regulations on other developing nations (not to mention ourselves). Currently, the European Union is struggling to reach agreement on its own climate rules with conflicting arguments happening between  Eastern European (and Italy) and Western European governments. Especially in the financial crisis, the climate measures being proposed upset the developing nations due to high costs, which stunts growth. They also feel that the regulations are unfair considering that the Western countries producing the majority of the emissions like the US are the ones proposing regulations, yet have barely complied with green policies, ’saying actions at this point can be voluntary for citizens’. Such a joke.
  • The next few years for cleantech could prove devastating for clean tech companies, venture capital firms and the polar ice caps as we try and agree upon a sound solution to how everyone will work together and with what technology. Obama should be picking out the best of the clean tech companies come the start of his term and make stiff regulations to mandate them throughout the country. This will inject the VC’s who backed the ideas with more money to go out and fund further projects and it will put us on our way to lower emissions. If we can’t inspire hope in the eyes of the experts and the scientists, then a layer of apathy across all green minds will surely lead to far greater problems for our ecosystem than sub-prime mortgage woes. All the experts want to see is some sort of adoption happening around the nations causing the large portions of emissions. Our current technologies may not be the best it will get, but its a start and things need to change in the face of an unhealthy environment.

(An overview of the survey, along with PowerPoint slides, is available here.)

[Post to Twitter] 

{ 1 comment }

  • Accel Partners, the VC fund which portfolio includes AdMob, Baidu, BitTorrent, Brightcove, Comscore, Facebook and dozens of other startups has just raised another $1 billion for two new funds.
  • The Accel Growth Fund will specifically focus on later stage investments and has raised $480 million. The Accel London III fund will focus on early stage companies as well as some mid-late stage European and Israeli startups. They raised $525 million. Accel will continue to invest in information technology, internet, digital media, mobile, networking, software, and services. Accel now manages $6 billion spread across their bracnhes in Palo Alto, London, Bangalore as China (via JV with IDG).
  • I won’t believe that we are really in tough times until one of the limited partners cuts off the funds and asks for the money being managed back. When $1 billion deals are still going through for VC’s to manage, the LP’s believe that the global economy is stable enough for new entries and later stages companies will be able to stick around.

[Post to Twitter] 

{ 0 comments }

Why Jonathan Miller Buying Yahoo Makes Sense

by Jason Wilk on December 2, 2008

  • Ex-AOL CEO, Jonathan Miller, is rumored to be talking with private equity and sovereign wealth funds in an effort to raise $28 to $30 billion to buy Yahoo for $20 to $22 a share.
  • Over the weekend, a false report from the UK’s Times Online said that a deal for Microsoft to buy Yahoo’s search business was close to going through for roughly $20 billion.
  • However, included in the false reports,  Jonathan Miller was potentially the person that would be taking over Yahoo as CEO if Microsoft were to go through with a deal. That turned out to be false, but this new deal makes a lot more sense. Microsoft never would have paid $20 billion just for the search business. It may have been the worst case of false citizen journalism getting into the mainstream news since the Steve Jobs heart attack.
  • This deal makes much more sense since Yahoo is extremely cheap right now and taking over the entire company makes a lot more sense than just a fraction. Moreover, with the financial crisis, not many players out there are willing to take the liability of buying a fledgling search company hat has seen a succession of poor management through the years. If the sovereign wealth funds invest, along with our own domestic VC’s to take over Yahoo (Jonathan Miller at the head), the company might be able to turn itself around to the point that the original $33 billion offer for Yahoo from Microsoft will come back when the financial crisis is lifted. That’s over $10 billion in profit.
  • Miller apparently met with Yahoo in the last few weeks while the company searches for a new chief executive. Miller has also been seen giving presentations to global funds on a secret mission. Let’s hope for Yahoo this deal goes through.

[Post to Twitter] 

{ 1 comment }

Why I Don’t Buy Into The Web 2.0 Death

by Jason Wilk on October 10, 2008

Just a comment I have been posting around the web to those who have jumped ship on Web 2.0

  • I’m sorry but VC’s , angels, etc. are still going to be hedging their bets on what technology or business model is going to be next, whether or not the companies they are looking at have revenue. These VC’s are merely telling people to slow their burn rate, try and create revenue if possible and just keep things steady while the government sorts through its incompetent bullshit and things start settling. VC’s last week were saying ‘everything is all good and this is their time to shine’. Now, because BofA downgrades display advertising, Google yanks back their earnings, Apple gets shorted on retail, Yahoo continues to suck and Sequoia has a meeting, we all start to suffer? Sequoia is one of the few VC’s that has a major interest in public finance (Goole, Apple, Yahoo, and more). This downturn economy is hurting their fund, however the rest of the intelligent VC’s who don’t have public interest should and will be investing. Of course, they will be reccomending to startups that they spend less money on ping pong tables, PR and beer bongs to move through the crisis without the need to try and raise another round of financing. But this is not time for everyone to call it quits; that is ignorance. Yes, many of the strartups out there don’t deserve to live until tomorrow because they aren’t innovative, well recieved, profitable and just plain dumb, but the saavy investors who have a good tank and don’t rely on Joe Public are going to stick with it. I just don’t buy into that Web 2.0 is done. Web 2.0 is not Pets.com remix. It is innovation and it is not a phase, it’s still testing grounds for the future ahead.

A tiny opinion by Jason

VB

[Post to Twitter] 

{ 14 comments }