Posts tagged as:

relevance

Carol Bartz Compensation Plan

by Jason Wilk on January 16, 2009

  • Breakdown of Yahoo’s new CEO compensation. A little ridiculous considering her experience running a search/advertising company (which is none)

1. Compensation. Your starting annual base salary will be at the rate of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per annum, less applicable taxes and withholdings, paid in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices and subject to annual review for increase (“Base Salary”). You will also be eligible to receive an annual target bonus of two hundred percent (200%) of your annual Base Salary (“Target Bonus”) to be determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”) in its discretion based on your performance and the Company’s performance for the relevant year. The bonus program will have a maximum bonus of two (2) times the annual Target Bonus.

2. Inducement Stock Option Grant. As a part of the Company team, we strongly believe that ownership of the Company by our employees is an important factor to our success. Therefore, as part of your compensation, the Compensation Committee will grant you at its next scheduled meeting at which equity grants are to be made (currently scheduled for January 30, 2009) (the “Grant Meeting”) an option to purchase five million (5,000,000) shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Inducement Option”). The per share exercise price for the Inducement Option will be the fair market value of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant as determined by the Compensation Committee… The Inducement Option shall be exercisable for seven (7) years from the date of grant, subject to earlier termination as provided herein, in the Plan and the applicable notice of stock option grant and stock option agreement.

[Post to Twitter] 

{ 2 comments }

Mozilla Relationship With Google On The Rocks

by Jason Wilk on December 22, 2008

  • Mozilla Corp, maker of the Firefox Web Browser is becoming displeased with their current relationship with Google.
  • John Lilly, Mozilla’s CEO, said in an interview last week, “We have a fine and reasonable relationship, but I’d be lying if I said that things weren’t more complicated than they used to be.” (CW)
  • What’s causing this animosity? Google’s own browser, Chrome, which is slowly gaining a share in the booming browser market. The interesting part of the newly competitive relationship is that Mozilla makes the bulk of their revenue from Google, not to mention brings in a nice chunk of change every year for the search giant. 88%, or about $60 million of Mozilla’s 2007 revenues came from Google. Google pays Mozilla for placement as the default search in Firefox as well as powers the search for Firefox’s homepage (they share the ad revenue)
  • What will Mozilla do? Well, even with the launch of Chrome, Firefox has seen a 24% increase in users since the beginning of the year. Currently 1 in 5 people are using the browser. Firefox only cooperates with Google so that it can provide its users with the best possible search experience and the most relevant ads. Looking towards the future and further competition from Google, Mozilla said they plan to explore other search revenue partners, starting with international country-specific firms first, such as Ramblr in Russia, Baidu in China, Yahooo in Japan, etc. When asked about searching for revenues outside of the standard web, Lilly said that 2009 will be the year which Firefox makes its strong entrance into the mobile browser market (Fennec is the name of the mobile browser).
  • Mozilla will do what it takes to compete with Google. There is no end in near sight to their relationship, but by no means will they retreat. Should Mozilla ditch Google sooner than later?

[Post to Twitter] 

{ 0 comments }

The Battle To Be The (Profitable) YouTube For Documents

by Jason Wilk on December 19, 2008

  • Y Combinator startup Scribd has raised its 4th round of financing – $9 million from Charles River Ventures, Redpoint Ventures and Kinsey Hills Group. This puts their total funding at around $12.8 million in an attempt to become the YouTube for documents. 
  • Launched one year after Scribd, Los Angeles based, DocStoc jumped onto the scene to capture some of the market. DocStoc has raised a total of $4 million and has executed well although still trails Scribd’s traffic. Both companies lack many direct hits and both are heavily reliant on search engines, which happen to love giving embeddable documents a high page rank. 
  • The battle next year will be to see who can become profitable. Both companies are seeing a lot of visitors, but converting dollars on those people are difficult when the only form of revenue is from google text ads. Although much of the content found on either site (such with YouTube) is unmonetizable, there is a considerable amount that is. Legal, tutorial, career, health & fitness, etc. documents all bring in people to the site that are looking for something specific and the document they eventually find was probably submitted by someone who is able to offer that service. Example: Someone looking for an NDA may be interested in talking with a lawyer, and the document they find may have have been uploaded by a local lawyer.
  • Both companies essentially would need to re-format the way their content in these categories are displayed to users, returning documents submitted by local businesses first. This would help convert leads for businesses as well as provide them with incentive to upload more quality documents to the site. This method would let DocStoc and Scribd monetize effectively by having sponsored documents as well as having users submit their email address to embed or download a document. You can charge companies per click on sponsored documents and sell leads to businesses looking for information about users downloading documents in areas relevant to their service offering. Moreover, by driving revenue from the content, both companies can begin to engage in paid search marketing for the areas that their SEO is lacking. Example: If you are searching for an NDA, places like LegalZoom dominate the space because they are a sponsored search result and can measure conversions. DocStoc or Scribd couldn’t make sense of spending search dollars without any way to bring the dollars back in. 
  • It will be interesting to see who wins this game. I have to assume that one of the companies will be crowned the winner in the end, since both operations require a decent amount of overhead and dollars will need to be brought in. It will be a battle, since both organizations have incredibly talented management, such as Jason Nazar (CEO of DocStoc). 

[Post to Twitter] 

{ 0 comments }

nyt-social-network-100k

  • Who says you can’t teach an old dog new tricks? The New York Time’s social networking service TimesPeople which launched in September has now racked up 100,000 registered users.
  • SAI notes that 100k users for TimesPeople is a paltry figure when compared to the NYT’s 15M monthly uniques.  Yes it is. But let’s not withold a golfclap here [golf clap] and celebrate a significant achievement for a company thats desperately in need of some optimism.
  • It’s clear that newspapers are struggling to find relevance in an increasingly online world but at the end of the day the NYT is still the most dependable name in news. period.  As news consumptions continues to fracture amongsnt small, online sources there is one trait that the NYT maintains: historical relevance. The NYT is one of the few constants in a ever growing sea of variables in the information consumption equation.
  • On a side note, I’m not sure that SAI’s gripe about twitter and .mac mail additions and/or the inability of friends to locate you via your secret address is particularly relevant (you’re in the big minority here).

[Post to Twitter] 

{ 1 comment }