by Jason Wilk on February 17, 2009

- Last week I had a chance to catch up with Pandora CTO, Tom Conrad at ContentNext’s EconMusic conference in Los Angeles. Tom was in high hopes about the success of Pandora lately, quoting that with their iPhone app alone, they had reached 3.5 million downloads and are seeing some of the highest CPM rates in the industry for internet radio advertising. Their traffic is at an all time high, above 3 million unique visitors a month according to Compete. Like many internet companies at the moment, relying on ad dollars to survive in a down economy is difficult (see: TinyComb). But Pandora is faced with an even more difficult scenario; The Webcaster Settlement Act, which has the potential to put Pandora out of business by raising the per song stream price to $0.19 a song. Please sign the petition at the bottom of the page to help save them from going out of business by lowering online steaming prices.
- Web sites that stream music have been fighting with the recording industry for two years over the royalties that the sites must pay for each song they play. The record companies and internet radio stations had until this past Sunday to reach an agreement. FM/AM radio stations that simultaneously stream their broadcast over the internet came to an agreement, but standalone services like Pandora and Yahoo Music were left twiddling their thumbs without a deal. According to several people close to the negotiations, the two sides were close to striking a deal, but at the end of the day were unable to agree on some fine points.
- According to the NYT, “a copy of the proposed term sheet, big Web sites with significant advertising revenue would have paid the greater of 25 percent of their revenue or a per-song fee of 0.088 cents, increasing to 0.14 cents in 2015. Small Web sites with less than $1.25 million in revenue would have paid the greater of 7 percent of expenses or 10 percent of their first $250,000 in revenue and 12 percent of additional revenue up to $1.25 million. If a small Webcaster grows and brings in more than $1.25 million in revenue, the rates for big Webcasters would start to apply. That has rankled some small sites, which say it discourages them from growing”.
- No one knows what will happen next, but one of the options on the table is to take the case to Congress to ask for an extension on the current deal. If both sides can’t reach a deal, it would give MySpcae Music a significant jump in market share for internet radio. MM is in a unique situation since they launched as a joint venture with all 4 major labels on board, where advertisers are paying per stream. As long as their advertisers stick around, they are laughing all the way to the bank while the rest of the Webcasters struggle for air. Let’s hope for the best for Pandora, the greatest radio station ever.
Cool fact: Pandora’s music genome members still listen to every album before it is processed into the recommendation system. There are still no auto-algorithms trying to tell you what you like. Let’s save this company.
by Jason Wilk on February 11, 2009

- Palm CEO Ed Colligan today made an official statemet to squash the rumors of a lawsuit being brough on by Apple over IP infringement. To make it clear, there is no peding legal actions being brought on from Cupertino. Here is what he said:
- The reason you do that is to have a defensive position. It’s like two little porcupines going around, and you don’t want to touch each other because you might get stung. You peacefully coexist and everything’s OK and you keep working together. We’re very respectful about people’s intellectual property, we believe we’re huge innovators and have been for a lot of years and that this product has an enormous number of innovations in it. If something does happen there, we do have the portfolio, we think to defend ourselves and to be successful doing that. But nothing’s happened to date, so we’re really just focused on getting the product out the doorPalm has 15 years worth of patents (over 1500 of them in total) and that in patent fights often go like this:
Trying to stay up on Palm? Check out these articles:
Update: Why Apple Will Not Pursue A Palm Lawsuit
Uh Oh. Sprint Dealys The New Palm Pro
Palm Pre Release Date Leaked
BestBuy Scores Exclusive Palm Pre Release
by Jason Wilk on December 19, 2008

- It’s official, the RIAA is tired of suing illegal downloaders. The organization that has been patrolling the industry for the last 5 years now wants to put the ISP’s in charge, because they couldn’t make a difference. The WSJ reports:
The decision represents an abrupt shift of strategy for the industry, which has opened legal proceedings against about 35,000 people since 2003. Critics say the legal offensive ultimately did little to stem the tide of illegally downloaded music. And it created a public-relations disaster for the industry, whose lawsuits targeted, among others, several single mothers, a dead person and a 13-year-old girl.
- The RIAA will now provide the ISPs with information (IP addresses) identifying accounts suspected of sharing music illegally. The ISPs wil then ask the owners of those accounts to stop. After the third request, the suspected infringer might lose his or her Internet connection (TC). This is the most viable option. People know their chances of being sued over illegally downloading music are about the same as being struck by lightning. Scaring people with cutting off their internet connection is much easier and ISP’s can take on many people at once. This may stop some people from downloading so much, but the frenzy will still continue.
by Jason Wilk on December 19, 2008

- Y Combinator startup Scribd
has raised its 4th round of financing – $9 million from Charles River Ventures, Redpoint Ventures and Kinsey Hills Group. This puts their total funding at around $12.8 million in an attempt to become the YouTube for documents.
- Launched one year after Scribd, Los Angeles based, DocStoc jumped onto the scene to capture some of the market. DocStoc has raised a total of $4 million and has executed well although still trails Scribd’s traffic. Both companies lack many direct hits and both are heavily reliant on search engines, which happen to love giving embeddable documents a high page rank.
- The battle next year will be to see who can become profitable. Both companies are seeing a lot of visitors, but converting dollars on those people are difficult when the only form of revenue is from google text ads. Although much of the content found on either site (such with YouTube) is unmonetizable, there is a considerable amount that is. Legal, tutorial, career, health & fitness, etc. documents all bring in people to the site that are looking for something specific and the document they eventually find was probably submitted by someone who is able to offer that service. Example: Someone looking for an NDA may be interested in talking with a lawyer, and the document they find may have have been uploaded by a local lawyer.
- Both companies essentially would need to re-format the way their content in these categories are displayed to users, returning documents submitted by local businesses first. This would help convert leads for businesses as well as provide them with incentive to upload more quality documents to the site. This method would let DocStoc and Scribd monetize effectively by having sponsored documents as well as having users submit their email address to embed or download a document. You can charge companies per click on sponsored documents and sell leads to businesses looking for information about users downloading documents in areas relevant to their service offering. Moreover, by driving revenue from the content, both companies can begin to engage in paid search marketing for the areas that their SEO is lacking. Example: If you are searching for an NDA, places like LegalZoom dominate the space because they are a sponsored search result and can measure conversions. DocStoc or Scribd couldn’t make sense of spending search dollars without any way to bring the dollars back in.
- It will be interesting to see who wins this game. I have to assume that one of the companies will be crowned the winner in the end, since both operations require a decent amount of overhead and dollars will need to be brought in. It will be a battle, since both organizations have incredibly talented management, such as Jason Nazar (CEO of DocStoc).
by Jason Wilk on November 6, 2008

- AT&T Mobility President and CEO Ralph De La Vega just announced they are working with Apple to let the iPhone serve as a tethered wireless modem for laptops soon.
- NetShare and iModem are two current iPhone tethering applications that need a jaibroken phone for them to be downloaded. Both are not available through the App Store.
- Thethering plans for AT&T in the past have been $10 a month, but have never worked with Macs and typically are slow.
- Some speculating the 3G or Wi-Fi tethering plan will cost around $50 or $60 a month (doubtful)
TZ