by Jason Wilk on January 30, 2009

- A new provision might give Verizon $1.6 billion in credits in the next two years to bring fast Internet connections to rural and low-income areas*. The House bill that passed Wednesday will provide $6 billion in grants to broadband projects. The latest Senate bill increases those grants to $9 billion says The WSJ.
- Here is the breakdown of tax cuts: Companies would get a 20% tax credit on investments made on broadband speeds of at least 5 megabits per second for unserved areas and a 10% cut for investment in low-income and rural areas.
- Providing unserved, rural, low-income areas with speeds of at least 100 megabits per second gets a 20 percent credit. Currently Verizon FiOS is one of the only ISP’s with speeds at or above 100 megabits per second, and here is why they will cash in. It’s all in the small print. The bill says “A qualified subscriber, with respect to next generation broadband services, means any nonresidential subscriber maintaining a permanent place of business in a rural, undeserved, or unserved area, or any residential subscriber.
- ”or any residential subscriber”–means that Verizon will get a tax cut for continuing to build out their FiOS network, which they are already currently doing. AT&T and the smaller phone companies don’t have technology that meets the 100 meg-bit-per-second threshold and Comcast is just beginning to roll out their new technology to meet the qualifications. According to analysts, Verizon is planning to spend $4 billion a year to continue building out FiOS, meaning they would get an annual tex credit of $800 million. The tax credits are in place to encourage the company to accelerate its plans and run FiOS past more homes over the next two years. How much did Verizon have to pay senator Rockefeller of West Virginia to include those last 4 words in the bill?
- What’s not included in the bill is that along with the tax credits to build the infrastructure, is an incentive to create more jobs with the additions or cut prices. Verizon, who cut 2700 jobs the day after Thanksgiving, and has cut 15,000 jobs since 2003 is receiving nothing but free money for this initiative. What’s worse is that the Senate proposal also would not require any recipients of the credits to abide by network neutrality. Verzion is already getting grants to help build out the 700 mhz wireless spectrum they won the auction for last year, and on top of that they had another record year, beating analysts projections by a landmark in the down economy. Remove the last 4 words from the bill, require them to create more jobs and lower prices, and then you have got yourself a potentially legitimate infrastructure grant. Other than that, this is ridiculous.
What Do You Think? Fill In The Blank In The Comments Section:
I Think This Deal Is (A) __________
by John Jorgensen on November 5, 2008

- On Nov. 1st, AT&T introduced bandwidth caps for their customers in Reno, Nevada, complete with tiered pricing.
- Bandwidth plans range from 20GB to 150GB per month with a $1 charge for every GB you use over your max.
- Similar cap plans have already been rolled out by Comcast and Time Warner in addition to Canada’s Rogers and New York’s Frontier.
- Forrester Research analyst Sally Cohen says AT&T is “trying to think strategically about how to monetize the network.”
- These service providers would like you to believe that there is currently a “bandwidth shortage,” otherwise known as an “exaflood,” caused by people like you watching videos of cats on YouTube all day which is overwhelming internet backbones and could soon render the entire net unusable.
- Studies have shown that no such shortage exists. Research by TeleGeography, a company that monitors Internet backbones and bandwidth levels, has found that the internet “is far from reaching its maximum capacity — in fact, global backbone capacity has grown faster than Internet traffic for two years running.”
I don’t have anything against a company taking advantage of supply & demand (within the extent of the law), but please, don’t lie about it. The sky isn’t falling; these ISPs are simply looking for ways to make more money.
Deconstructing The Exaflood Myth – There is no bandwidth crunch boogeyman
Wired
by Jason Wilk on November 3, 2008

- A legislation that was introduced last year in France is gaining traction in France with an overwhelming majority in the French Senate.
- The law will act as follows:
- Users caught downloading illegal content will receive an e-mail warning from the their ISP. Strike 1
- The second “strike” comes with a written letter in the mail warning them to stop.
- If the same user is caught a third time, his or her Internet connection will be cut off for a year.
- A similar legislation has been brought up in the UK as well as Australia. US ISP providers are taking alternative routes that are less harsh, such as Comcast capping download rates. Should this law be passed anywhere?
ARS
by Jason Wilk on September 30, 2008
- As Comcast rolls out their bandwidth cap to its broadband subscribers on Wednesday, a vast majority of people don’t know how much data they actual use.
- BitMeter2 will help you show you how much data you use, so you will never go over the limit.
- It’s free too.
by Jason Wilk on September 30, 2008
- Mark Cuban has been telling Comcast they need to eliminate P2P sharing and put a cap on broadband usage.
- Wednesday they will start the capping, charging users stiff prices if they break the 250GB data usage.
- Their claim is 5% of users account for 40-80% of total data.
- 51% of people say they would jump to another carrier if a download cap were forced on them.
- Om Malik has been vocal in saying this will stunt innovation and today’s large data consumers are the average user of tomorrow.
Will heavy data users that break the cap, be more prone to be fed to the RIAA?
Om
Verizon Getting Government Help? Scam
by Jason Wilk on January 30, 2009
What Do You Think? Fill In The Blank In The Comments Section:
I Think This Deal Is (A) __________
{ 0 comments }