From the category archives:

Baidu

  • The Chinese Business News on Tuesday reported that Wang Fengchang, CEO of legal information and lawyer listing site lawease.cn, has signed up more than 100 sites to file a class action lawsuit against Baidu (Nasdaq:BIDU). The lawsuit stems from publishers claiming fraudulent clicks, unlawful sales practices and trademark violation. Baidu intimidated companies into becoming bid-ranking clients or threatened they would be blocked in search results. They have also been accused over selling ads to illegal medical companies. Involved in the 100-site alliance are e-commerce websites in the medical, travel and home appliance industries.
  • On top of the current lawsuit, the State Administration for Industry & Commerce (SAIC) is soon to begin investigate Baidu for anti-monopoly violations. The company has over 70% market share in China.
  • As the eeconomy struggles, search companies have had to find new avenues for both gaining market share and turn dollars. We have questioned both Google and Baidu’s practices over the last few months to try and generate extra revenue from new advertisers and industries once shunned by both giants.

[Post to Twitter] 

{ 0 comments }

Ethics In Question As Search Companies Look For Profits

by Jason Wilk on December 10, 2008

  • In a down economy, search companies are being pitted against Wall St. and Madison Ave., who think that times will be tough for the current giants of search. Their theory is that whatever way you cut up a company like Google, at the end of the day you will only find out that they are just an advertising company. We are seeing such proof in Google and Baidu’s ethical decisions as of late, searching high and low for any remaining industries or outlets that haven’t been studied for gold.
  • Did you think Google Maps was just a nice addition Google wanted to offer to users needing directions? Google is now making money on it through ads. What about Android? Did you think the Open Handset Alliance was just something that Google wanted to do for the good of mobile phones? Nope, Google wanted their foot in the door to get Google search on decks. What about their cool applications on the iPhone with voice search? Google just announced they are offering advertisers the ability to directly target mobile customers through their search app now. The latest stretch for Google was to allow beer advertisers to purchase AdWords campaigns in the fall and now hard alcohol companies as of yesterday. This is the first time we have seen Google go after anything and everything with a dollar sign at the expense of compromising previous decisions on industries that they wanted to stay clear of like alcohol.
  • Baidu has been even more scrutinized. If you thought hard alcohol was questionable, Baidu has gotten itself in actual trouble by letting unlicensed medical companies advertise their products or services through search results. Talk about an unethical industry to be making money from. This case goes on top of the already active anti-trust suit that is being pushed upon Baidu and their 61% search market domination in China. Because of the suits, JP Morgan has cut earnings forecasts for the company by 5% for this year and 19% for 2009, citing weaker revenue from the medical and pharmaceutical sector since Baidu shut them out.
  • Neither search company wanted these tough times to come so soon after they have been rapidly growing. Google had grand plans to spread it’s seed everywhere with useful products for everyone and then one day flip the switch on the revenue. With these tough times, they don’t have the cushion to wait. All it means is that anything Google pushes out from now one will cause one to raise the question, where will they put the advertising in? Ethics is the single most important issue for both search giants, especially in the coming years with localized advertising coming at you ‘on the go’. The last thing they want is further skepticism of monetization and privacy concerns surrounding their companies as it has already been in question for years.
  • What do you think about Baidu and Google looking high and low for revenue so soon at the expense of ethics?

[Post to Twitter] 

{ 3 comments }

Baidu Facing Large Joint Lawsuit on the Horizon

by John Jorgensen on December 2, 2008

image_preview1

  • Baidu, China’s #1 search engine with 70% market share (vs. Google’s 26%) is facing an upcoming joint lawsuit by as many as 100 companies who are tired of the search engine’s monopoly status and bullying tactics.
  • The root of the problem lies within Baidu’s advertising system. Unlike Google which separates paid search results from organic, Baidu mixes paid results seamlessly into organic results making impossible to tell the difference between the two without checking hyperlinks (paid results are precluded with http://baidu.com for tracking purposes). For a good explanation of Baidu’s paid advertising, go here.
  • In November, critics on Chinese state television blasted Baidu’s business model and accused them of allowing unlicensed medical sites to take up top spots in search results (Baidu has said they will remove these sites) and of blocking sites that chose not to pay for keywords (Baidu denies).
  • A group of lawyers has already gained the support of 50 companies for a joint lawsuit against Baidu. The group says they will wait to file the suit until the total reaches 100.
  • Baidu’s business model does not provide a fair representation of search results for its users. By mixing paid and organic results they taint the concept of true search. Some may argue that the top organic results on Google are practically paid anyways due to all the cash they’ve dropped into SEO, but there’s still a big difference between fighting your way to the top via building out a big content site and instantly buying your way into the top results with a zero-value sales page. Besides, has Baidu seen how much money Google is making doing it the up-front way?

FT

[Post to Twitter] 

{ 2 comments }