Facebook Now Looking For Money At $5-6B Valuation

by Jason Wilk on April 30, 2009

picture-38

  • According to the New York Post, Facebook has just held informal exploratory meetings with Providence Equity Partners, General Atlantic, Bain Capital, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and others. The article cites Facebook to be looking for fresh capital at a $5 to $6 billion valuation, however no one is willing to shell out for more than a $2 billion to $3 billion range. (Wauters, TC)
  • People familiar with the matter, are claiming Facebook’s attempt to raise additional capital is creating quite a stir among existing investors, which includes Accel Partners, Greylock Partners, Meritech Capital Partners, Microsoft and Peter Thiel. Microsoft feeling it the most, jumping in at a $15B valuation with a quarter million dollar investment, that in this state may have earned them about 8% of the company. People like Thiel say it’s time to start making money off of the user base, which at this point is causing the company harm it’s so large (200+ million now)
  • Facebook may not have a lot of choice when it comes to what valuation they will take money. The company is burning through at leat $20 million a month in cash and cannot stop their unbelievably quick (but unmonetizable) growth internationally. If things keep going the way they are, Facebook could be out of money by 2011. Time to start charging?

Looking For A Job Or Need To Hire? Join The Thousands On TinyComb’s Job Board

[Post to Twitter] 

  • DZ
    It depends on your value system Jason, from what you state your value system does not rate providing for the basic needs of humanity higher than giving people another online space for glorified chat. That's your prerogative, but the world will change regardless and many investors are recognizing this.

    I have worked alongside the executives of a company that received over $100M in the 90's for their glorified chat, probably from some of the same VC/companies (MS, Accel...) that give money to FB. I know 1st hand what a huge sink hole that idea is.

    Let me tell you why FB is not worth even $2B... social networks by their own virtue are highly dynamic and driven by generational technology adoption, and when combined with the fact that large companies are highly inefficient in the arena of innovation (hence the existence of VC...) you have a company that is in a sector that will always need a tremendous amount of capital to retain its market share position. A successful company in this space will have figured out a long time ago how to sell and make money. That is what the guys at myspace/intermix did, and facebook has yet to do - if ever.

    As far as none of these VC's investing in alt-e, nanotech, healthcare goes I see their representatives at all the green, cleantech, solar, energy financing conferences and forums I go to. Regarding health care: take a look at demographic curves for the 1st world and consider where money flows when a huge portion of the population starts getting older and age takes its toll on the body...

    Dominik Zynis
    Editor
    www.chloregy.org
    Green & CSR News

    PS- you need to review the portfolio of said VCs prior to making a factual claim and looking like you are speaking off the cuff.
  • Jason Wilk
    -1 Dominik. The VC's involved in Facebook don't invest in those sorts of technologies and there are hundreds dedicated to those sectors. I woudn't say investing in health care is any more commendable than what you call a 'glorified chat room'.
  • I can easily burn $20M/month... and I'll make sure it is used to make society better rather than just another glorified chat room... if these VCs want to throw money down a hole at least they should invest it into some long term R&D like cancer research, nanotechnologies, education institutions in 3rd world countries, health care, alternative energies, ethics training, social change institutions, jobs in places like the middle east or American ghettos so young men have something better to do then sell drugs or walk around with AKs... the list goes on and on, instead of squandering it like this.

    A place like Myspace was profitable, you can look at their SEC reports (look up Intermix Media...) the company was in the black before Fox bought them.

    So there is no reason why facebook should be unprofitable, oh except other than the CEO's can't scrap a lick.
  • Jason Wilk
    elaborate...
  • The biggest danger to the investors in Facebook is the rapidly changing state of today's game. The moment the next new thing gains enough momentum...Facebook's value could quickly start sliding off that cliff over there. www.twitter.com/dlevinethinks
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post: Apple Patent Confirms Carbon Fiber Casing Coming Soon

Next post: Chrysler’s Chapter 11 Filing